Another side of Lesley Riddoch

The art of not turning the other cheek

Last Sunday Post column in full

Gals -- we know life ain't fair. If it was men would have times of the month and women would have garden sheds. The gender pay gap is still 20% and women have lost more jobs than men in the recession. Girls do well at school but less well landing top jobs. Childcare still falls to mums, nursery places are harder to find than Amazon tax returns and headlines about child-abusing celebrities and teenage-girl exploitation shows what happens when warped, controlling men get power not jail. The grim realities of life can be sobering. But normally women just shrug and get on with it. How can we push for change without sounding like hopeless girners and special pleaders? Last week some gallous women showed the way. Susie Wolff may not be a household name – yet. But the 30 year-old racing driver from Oban got an apology from track legend Sir Stirling Moss after he said women lacked the mental strength for Formula One so racing "under life-threatening conditions" would prove too stressful. Young Susie -- a test driver for the Williams team – said his remarks made her cringe. Lo and behold, a few days later Stirling phoned to apologise and wish Susie well in her quest to join teammate Jenson Button on the F1 grid. Nice one Stirling – and well done Susie for challenging an unthinking, sexist throwaway line.

Leader Conference, Nigel Farage, Gary Tank Commander and Skiffs

This week’s @lesleyriddoch podcast starts with Lesley appearring on Radio 4’s ‘Leader Conference’ ( you can 'listen again' here ), takes in Nigel Farage and 70s direct action, Norman Tebbit and gay marriage, Gary Tank Commander and skiffs. And highland hospitality. And how Lesley pays for things on the move.

Catch a grip over Europe – Radio 4

I've just got back from a very entertaining evening in the New Broadcasting House for the last in the present series of Radio Four's Leader Conference series where five hacks decide which of the day's stories should be the subject of a leader opinion column in a mythical newspaper – Andrew Rawnsley of the Observer chaired the discussion along with myself, Kirsty Buchanan of the Sunday Express; Nigel Nelson of the People; Aditya Chakrabortty of the Guardian; and Graeme Demianyk of the Western Morning News. The programme went out live and I'm quietly chuffed at managing to get a few Scottish perspectives in without (apparently) irritating the heck out of the (mostly) London contributors and productions team. Not that I'm worried about annoying folk – just that it stops people hearing you. Anyway, the programme website seemed to embrace my suggestion that David Cameron and the whole English media should "catch a grip" over Britain in Europe; we discussed the crisis in Accident and Emergency services (and Im grateful to Colin Mair of the Improvement Service for an invaluable chat that gave me the facts and figures about the poor, frail, malnourished and cold elderly making up a growing proportion of A&E admissions; and I seemed to get general support for the notion men-only golf clubs should not get the Ryder Cup or Open tournaments. Have a listen. And thanks to Producer Simon Coates and PA Jacqui Johnson for a warm and welcoming experience.

What I would have said about Brown if there had been time.

A few thoughts on Gordon Brown’s “weighty” speech yesterday that couldn’t be crammed into the discussion on last night’s STV Scotland Tonight programme. 

1. Play it again Sam – despite all the big billing for Gordon Brown’s “re-entry” speech, the points he made were not detailed, precise or new. In a speech at the Edin Bookfest in August 2012 Gordon first said Scotland was stronger pooling resources with the rest of the UK  and a week later at the festival of politics 2012 he warned of a ‘race to the bottom’, where social conditions would differ across the various parts of Britain. That’s nine months since we first/last heard all of this and no real advance. How on earth did all the press (including me) forget we’d already had Gordon’s re-entry to the indyref debate last year?? Maybe, it was so un-momentous and easy to forget? Maybe we accord far too much air time to Big Old Boys on the basis of status (whatever that actually is for a political leader with such a chequered career). Either way it’s genuinely disappointing a guy who could easily have brought big new dimensions into the indy debate didn’t bother. Instead – banging on about his Scottish credentials when no-one was questioning them – Broon sounded like an occasional visitor to Scotland drawing attention to his OWN preference for a career at Westminster not Holyrood.

2. Further devolution or not? In an interview with Bernard Ponsonby, Brown hinted of further devolution but wouldn’t specify. He talked about fiscal autonomy (which he opposes) and fiscal equalisation (or pooling resources) which he supports. But what is fiscal equalisation apart from the status quo where a devolved parliament relies on handouts from the centre instead of raising and being responsible for its own tax and spend policy? I’d love to have asked fellow Scotland Tonight guest Simon Pia for a definition of fiscal equalisation.

3. There is no #unitedwithlabour website – just a hard to find via google page on the Scottish Labour website. There’s a You tube film there with 233 views when I looked which talked a lot about Labour’s role in setting up the NHS, post war housing etc. It’s very back to the future, slightly sentimental and general. Of course this is also true of some SNP/Yes stuff. But since there is just ONE video representing the direction of this new group it needed to be stronger. Also where was Alistair Darling at the United with Labour launch? I cant be bothered with personality politics and so didn’t raise the point in the limited time we had last night. But these two guys don’t talk since Darling criticised Brown in memoirs Back from the Brink saying the former PM could be “brutal and volcanic” and had released “attack dogs” on him for daring to warn the coming recession would be the worst for 60 years. It makes you wonder why others should unite with labour if these two cabinet minister colleagues can’t bury the hatchet. What indeed is the whole rushed #unitedwithlabour project about? It’s not as if #bettertogether is so full of Tories that it actively poses a real headache for Labour members. You sometimes wonder if Alistair Darling is the only spokesperson bettertogether has. Surely one truly beefy campaign is better(together) than two?

4. Gordon talked about “equal rights for everyone no matter which community you live in” within the UK – wot about the overheated south versus the economically baltic north? According to analysts Wealth Insight – quoted by the FT last week -- London has a quarter of a million dollar millionaires – that’s 1 in 29 Londoners! Yes – that’s amazing. Development in London is going on apace (Crossrail is biggest construction job in UK tho to be fair new Forth Crossing is 2nd biggest) – so it seems like the Crucible of the financial crisis is getting the lion’s share of the economic growth. This is a deep seated flaw in the over-centralised UK economic model that damages the north of England probably more than Scotland. House prices in top London districts are rising by £27 every hour of the day and night so outsiders haven’t a hope in hell of affording to move down and cash in. Without a proper regional policy across the whole of the UK (England must be Europe’s most centralised state) how can there be “equal rights for everyone no matter which community you live in” as Gordon Brown claims?

5. This is not just to lay into Broon. 2/3s of Scots want the two governments to negotiate (fat chance) the campaign leaders debate directly with one another asap (fat chance) and TV and radio to broadcast as much lively but non-partisan opinion as possible (some chance but not fast). Any chance of that both sides or will Alex Salmond just hang out for another year to get a gig with David Cameron?

6. So that’s it – no more free passes for Broon just cos he was once a Prime Minister. No more smiling politely while he gives another repeat performance. Opinion polls suggest Scots currently back the union, so the lack of dynamism and vision from the likely “winners” in 2014 is just too depressing. Must do bettertogether

UKIP and the SNP, Culture, Poverty and Arctic Convoy Heroes

UKIP’s recent election results stirred things up down in England. Lesley was keen to point out the differences between UKIP and the SNP after parallels had been drawn in her Scotsman column.

After an event “Who Runs Culture in Scotland?” in the Tron with a packed panel, including Alasdair Gray, the answer is a bit clearer.

The ‘Poverty in South Lanarkshire’ conference and some biological explanations from the Chief Medical Officer prompt some out loud thinking.

The long overdue recognition of the Arctic Convoy  heroes  is something we also touch upon respectfully  in this week’s @lesleyriddoch podcast.

We are Northern Lights in Cineworld

First Scottish documentary to get a "big screen" release -- We are Northern Lights in Cineworld this Friday 3rd of May in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee, Aberdeen & Falkirk, screening for a full week http://wearenorthernlights.com/your-world-our-world-cineworlds. We saw it in Dundee -- uplifting, very Scottish, funny, honest. Do go and see it if you can. A BBC preview too.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-22301892

Wheels and Communities take over Scottish Parliament

There’s a lot on the menu this week. A recent YouGov Poll suggests the Scottish public is unconvinced by Alex Salmond’s arguments for independence – are the wheels coming off ? Is it just the effect of lots of negative or indifferent campaigning? Is it to be expected , and part of a master plan?

Lesley was at the ‘Future is Local’ event at the Scottish Parliament and comes back with a few insights ,  including  Angus Macmillan of Storas Uibhist, MSPs in the chamber and the role of AV.

And finally, Barack Obama was a top performer at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner  (check out the YouTube footage ) . Leadership and comedy – is this possible ?

Are you convinced – is it right to even ask?

Today's Scotsman column tries to tackle an innocent question from a Finnish camera crew in Scotland last week to report on the Scottish independence debate -- why so little action, banners, protests? I see folk in the Yes campaign are divided on the merits of even tackling the issue of apparent lack of momentum from the indy campaign. Others seem to agree there's been little attempt to rebutt negativity from Better Together. I understand misgivings about tackling polls like the one commissioned by Better Together. If the poll asked if voters were "convinced" about the case for staying in the union, I'd guess the number of doubters would be equally high. Convinced is a high threshold -- way beyond "absence of reasonable doubt" for example. But once a story has the oxygen of publicity (not my choice) you either ignore it or try to deal with it. Equally risky strategies I'd suggest. Seems to me there IS no template for how a modern "independence" campaign sd be performing 18 months from the finishing line when the population is clearly divided. We are in totally unchartered territory. But ignoring over-egged headlines for a minute, it does feel quiet if you are not inside the "yes" loop. I don't know how many "undecided" folk attend Yes events. I'd be delighted to know. But it's entirely possible "foot soldiers" on both sides feel busy and are canvassing away like billyo on doorsteps every weekend whilst the public "shared" debate feels gey quiet. Strikes me it's high time big hitters on all sides got onto TV – like a Question Time with Alex and Alistair Darling for example --and debated with one another now in one single arena. And at the local level there was more help for community-led and owned events which let people enter the indyref debate on their own terms. Anyway our regular Lesley Riddoch weekly podcast has been recorded and is being posted above even as I write (on this subject, The Future is Local parliamentary event last week and Obama's speech to White House Corrs) and the Scotsman column is here.

Mostly Belfast

This week’s @lesleyriddoch podcast was recorded after Lesley’s return from a stay in Belfast. It’s been a couple of weeks since the last pod and there was a lot to catch up with. Margaret Thatcher’s funeral, the Boston Marathon bombing and the perspectives from Belfast all feature in a lively digest.

Is it the Guides wot won it over Page 3 pix?

Today's Sunday Post column in full

Is it curtains for Page Three? And are sensible badge, whistle and neckerchief- wearing Guides responsible? Last week Girlguiding UK sent a letter to Sun bosses backing a new petition to ban girly pictures from the paper. The letter clearly rattled News Corp's beleaguered proprietor Rupert Murdoch who tweeted "Page three so last century! You maybe right, don't know but considering. Perhaps halfway house with glamorous fashionistas." So is the topless model battle over and (to misquote a famous headline) – was it Girl Guides wot won it? Labour MP Clare Short led a campaign in the 80s and was labelled "Killjoy Clare." But her stand did prompt change. "Busty beauties" disappeared from most daily tabloids after research showed some chaps were too embarrassed to share papers with wives and daughters. A dent in readership meant a dent in advertising – so Page 3 started to fade out. The Sun however remained resistant -- until the marvellous Olympics of last year when a bare-boobed Page Three girl was given more prominence than "Golden Girl" Jessica Ennis with Britain's first track and field gold medal. A new "No to Page 3" petition began with fresh momentum – and good timing.

A year earlier the Sun's sister paper the News of the World was shut down after sensational revelations about the paper's practices. Sleazy and shabby headlines were hitherto justified by sales. But after details of Milly Dowler's phone hacking emerged -- that argument would never wash again. Next came the Jimmy Savile abuse scandal – which showed how easily a predatory man could operate in a celebrity-obsessed and casually sexualised society.

Defenders say there is no link between all of this and Page Three. They accuse campaigners of double standards since glossy young women's magazines have even more provocative pictures and "sexy" headlines on front pages – and that's true. Surveys show most teenagers read about sex frequently and view pornography online. Indeed that could be why the Guides decided to act. The pressure on young women to be desirable and sexually available is never-ending in these private, hard to access worlds. No matter how often mums and dads tell daughters education counts and dignity matters – behind the scenes a different, demeaning message is sent and received every day. Not just by adults. But by young men and women who are also Scouts and Guides. Up till now, embarrassed parents have turned away from the teenager's quandary, leaving them to pick a way through this moral maze unaided. Bizarre isn't it. We care so much about children but leave them to grapple with the toughest issues about identity, behaviour and appearance alone.

On the one hand girls are pin-ups and babes. On the other hand, the babe born to Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, could be the first royal daughter to become Queen in her own right. Royal pecking order is hardly as important as day to day respect for women as workers, citizens, mothers and daughters. And of course, if blokes get too bashful to hand on a paper, and women avoid titles with Page Three pin-ups, readership will fall. Times are changing – in polite society at least.

So the Girl Guides are simply practising the message they've preached for more than a century -- "Do a good turn." If the Sun can't see that girls of today are the readers, writers, advertisers, consumers and newspaper purchasers of tomorrow – the Guides can. The only remaining question is simple -- can Rupe?